Monica A. Fennell

As pro bono director, Monica leads the pro bono program across Taft’s 12 offices. This includes identifying and developing opportunities for the program, establishing an integrated pro bono system across the firm, and ensuring that all Taft pro bono legal services are consistent with Taft’s values and commitment to improving the communities it serves.

With over 30 years of experience in the legal industry, Monica brings a trusted perspective to Taft’s pro bono program. Before joining Taft, she was part of a team that managed a firm’s pro bono program and led pro bono activity at five of the firm’s offices, including over 400 attorneys. Prior to that, Monica served as the executive director of the Indiana Pro Bono Commission and was a Fellow at the Supreme Court of the United States. Monica began her legal career as a litigator in big cities and a small town.

Monica earned her B.A., cum laude, from Williams College and a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center. She also has a professional development certificate in peace and conflict studies as a Rotary Peace Fellow at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand.

Recent Selected Speeches

• Global Peace: Stability and Sustainability, International Day of Peace webinar, Rotary International District 3240 (2021).
• Launching Court-Based Pro Bono Clinics, Including Ethics Tips, American Bar Association's Judicial Division webinar (2021).
• Feeling Good by Doing Good: Access to Justice and Wellness, American Bar Association's Judicial Division webinar (2021).
• Hosting Pro Bono Clinics In-House, ABA/NLADA Equal Justice Conference (2021).

Publications

• "Using Peace and Conflict Analysis to Spur Innovation in Access to Justice in the U.S.," Problems, Threats and Challenges to Peace and Conflict Resolution, ed. Maria Ochwat (Torun, Poland: Adam Marszalek Publishing House) (2021).
• ABA Free Legal Answers—helping to stem the tide of civil cases, ABA Judicial Division Record (2021).
• Celebrating Pro Bono in a Pandemic, ABA Judicial Division Record (2020).
• Using State Legal Needs Studies to Increase Access to Justice for Low-Income Families, 48 Fam. Ct. Rev. 619 (2010).
• Emergent Identity: A Comparative Analysis of the New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and the Supreme Court of the United States, 22 Temp. Int’l & Comp. L.J. 279 (2008).