Taft Ranked "Highly Recommended" Law Firm By Benchmark Litigation
CLEVELAND, OH – Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP was ranked a 2011 “Highly Recommended Firm” in Ohio by Benchmark Litigation, the definitive guide to America's leading business litigation firms and attorneys. The firm was one of only nine Ohio firms awarded the highest ranking.
In Cleveland, Partner-in-charge Stephen M. O’Bryan and partner David H. Wallace, who also co-chairs the firm’s Litigation Practice Group, were named “Local Litigation Stars” in the practice areas of commercial litigation and securities. Only those individuals who were consistently recommended as reputable and effective litigators by clients and peers receive this designation.
In its annual guide for Ohio, Benchmark Litigation said that Taft is “well regarded and respected” by local peers and that clients herald the firm for its “very aggressive representation, depth of experience and creative strategies for controlling costs.”
At Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, delivering outstanding legal performance to help clients succeed is what drives and motivates its more than 300 attorneys and legal professionals every day. Taft has offices in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus and Dayton, Ohio; Indianapolis, Indiana; Northern Kentucky; Phoenix, Arizona; and Beijing, China. The firm practices across a wide range of industries, in virtually every area of law, including: Business and Finance; Litigation; Labor and Employment; Intellectual Property; Business Restructuring, Bankruptcy and Creditors' Rights; Environmental; Health and Life Sciences; Private Client Services; Real Estate and Tax law. With a proven track record of experience since 1885, Taft is proud to celebrate its 125th anniversary in 2010. The firm offers breadth and depth of legal expertise coupled with a trusted business perspective, helping its clients, big and small, regionally, nationally and internationally, in reaching their goals.
In This Article
You May Also Like
Inflation Relief for DoD Contractors The Supreme Court’s Axon Decision and Its Effects on Federal Agency Adjudications