taftlaw | environmental practice | subscribe | contact us | forward
Taft's Environmental Practice provides nationally recognized services in the areas of  trial practice, Superfund defense and negotiation, enforcement defense, cost-recovery for plaintiffs and defendants, criminal environmental defense, environmental insurance and toxic tort litigation, mold and sick building litigation, lawsuits involving environmental problems discovered as a result of real property transfers or mergers and acquisitions, Brownfields redevelopment, defense of claims of occupational exposures, and administrative proceedings before state and federal agencies. Taft's environmental lawyers also regularly are engaged in insurance disputes concerning environmental issues and agricultural issues involving CAFOs and CFOs. As a Taft client, you can utilize the capital of 31 intensely motivated and focused attorneys in all facets of environmental law.
Environmental Mediation: Five Tips for Success 

Frank Deveau
Kim K. Burke

kburke@taftlaw.com(513) 357-9369 

 

With empirical studies showing that 90-95% of all cases (including environmental litigation) settle prior to trial, it is baffling how little preparation goes into preparing for mediation.  Mediation has proven itself a resilient mechanism to resolve legal conflicts.  Many courts require it.  As environmental trial lawyers, we spend an enormous amount of time with jury consultants ensuring that we know as much as we can about potential jurors.  Yet we fall short of the mark when it comes to mediation preparation. Continue reading to learn five tips to help you prior to and during environmental mediation.

 

 » continue reading

 

 

Indiana's Environmental Legal Action Statute: Court Interpretations

Brad SUgarman
Bradley R. Sugarman
bsugarman@taftlaw.com(317) 713-3526

 

Indiana's Environmental Legal Action statute (the "ELA") allows plaintiffs to bring an environmental legal action against a person that caused or contributed to the release of a hazardous substance or petroleum to recover reasonable costs of cleaning up the contamination.  IND. CODE § 13-30-9-2.  The ELA is often alleged (along with numerous other claims) in cases involving environmental contamination because it can provide for the recovery of attorney fees.  Ind. Code § 13-30-9-3(a)(6).  Recently, there have been numerous state and federal cases examining the purpose and extent of liability under the ELA.  

 

 » continue reading   

Environmental Fate and Transport Modeling: New Innovative Model Released 
 

Robert Bilott
Robert A. Bilott

bilott@taftlaw.com

(513) 357-9638 

On Januray 12, 2011, an article was released on-line by the journal, Environmental Science & Technology, describing a new retrospective environmental fate and transport model that links several different modeling systems, including AERMOD, PRZM-3, BreZo, MODFLOW, and MT3DMS, to model historic environmental contaminant air dispersion, transit through the vadose zone, surface water transport, and groundwater flow and transport.  The authors developed the model to generate retrospective predictions of historic exposures to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) for use in epidemiologic analyses of thousands of people who used certain drinking water supplies in West Virginia and Ohio contaminated with PFOA.  

 

 » continue reading  

Federal Abstention When State Environmental Proceedings Are Pending 
 

Kim K. Burke 

kburke@taftlaw.com(513) 357-9369 

On January 26, 2011, the First Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the decision of the district court to abstain from hearing a RCRA citizen suit brought concerning a leaking underground storage tank (UST), even though a state administrative proceeding was pending and addressing the same issues.  Chico Service Station, Inc. v. Sol Puerto Rico Limited, -- F.3d -- , 2011 WL 228048 (1st Cir. Jan. 26, 2011).  The plaintiff brought a RCRA citizens suit requesting an injunction to compel clean up of a formerly leaking UST.  The Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board (EQB) had been addressing this tank, the investigation, and its cleanup, for 17 years.  An extensive series of remedial investigations had been conducted.  No lawsuit had been filed against the defendant owner of the tank by the regulatory agency, but the agency and the tank owner were working together within the territory's regulatory structure to address the UST remediation.   

 

 » continue reading   

    



Environmental Law Insight is used to inform our clients and friends of significant new developments and current issues in environmental law. For more information about Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, please visit http://www.taftlaw.com.

These materials have been prepared by Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No person or organization should act upon this information without first seeking professional counsel.

We cannot and do not represent you until our client intake process is completed. Further, we reserve the right to accept or decline representing any person or organization in any matter. Accordingly, please do not send us any confidential information about any matter until you receive a written statement from us advising you that we represent you (an "engagement letter"). When you receive an engagement letter from one of our attorneys, you will be our client, and we may exchange confidential information freely. Again, do not send us unsolicited confidential information until you speak with one of our attorneys and get authorization to send that information to us.

Some aspects of this Web site may allow you to register for newsletters, events, functions, or seminars hosted by, sponsored by, or associated with Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP. The transmission or receipt of any information related to registration for any event or service does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP's Web site and associated materials may provide links to other websites that may be useful or informative.These links to third party sites or information are not intended, and should not be interpreted by readers, as constituting or implying our endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation of the third party information, products or services found there.

The following statement is required by many states, including Kentucky: "THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT."



February 2011 Issue

· Environmental Mediation: Five Tips
  for Success
· Indiana's Environmental Legal Action
  Statute
· Environmental Fate and Transport
  Modeling
· Federal Abstention When State
  Environmental Proceedings are
  Pending 
 






This email was sent to ksharpe@taftlaw.com by taft@taftlaw.com |  
Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe| Privacy Policy.
Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP | 425 Walnut Street | Suite 1800 | Cincinnati | OH | 45202